Home » Why Canada’s “private healthcare” isn’t really private

Why Canada’s “private healthcare” isn’t really private

by Naomi Parham
In recent months, a series of severe shortages in Canada’s health care system has reignited debate about the benefits of incorporating “private health care” into the Canadian system. Saskatchewan has turned to nonprofit clinics to find a solution Backlog in joint operations. And in a particularly dramatic example, British Columbia sends its cancer patients out of the country to seek treatment in Washington state. But none of this is truly “private healthcare” in the way most people around the world understand it (and in a way that would actually help alleviate some of the systemic bottlenecks in Canada’s healthcare system. Look at that Watch the video or read the transcript to learn more.

This ad has not yet loaded, but your article continues below.

There is much controversy surrounding the introduction of “private healthcare” into the Canadian system. But you can all relax because it’s not actually private health care. It’s still public health care, but only the worst version of it.

In Canada, it is illegal to purchase insurance for anything that falls under the public system. No one else does. In the Netherlands, New Zealand, Japan and the UK you can save a few thousand dollars a year on private insurance and – if you need stitches – you can either go to a public hospital or use your insurance to have the stitches done privately. There is a completely different healthcare system here.

That is private healthcare.

But Canada insists the only countries that need stitches are allowed to pay for them. So all of these for-profit healthcare providers still work for the government — and draw on the same rationed supply of doctors and healthcare resources as everyone else.

Except they make a profit.

Recommended by Editorial

Related Posts

Leave a Comment